|
A Compelling Kind of Love
There are two dimensions to love, two
very distinct and significant kinds of love – one of them we could
call the pleasant love, the pleasurable love, the love that makes
you feel good, that makes you feel content, satisfied, full,
complete.
There is another
love, maybe even more crucial and essential to relationship and this
I think we could call the compelling love, the kind of love that
doesn’t let you be content. It motivates you, compels you to get up
and do something. It’s a love that compels action. It can be
described more as a commitment, a devotion, a responsibility to the
one you love and that kind of love is probably the core, the heart
of a relationship.
So here’s the
point. The point of it is that there is a certain kind of love;
there is a certain kind of sympathy, a certain kind of
considerateness that we can describe as beautiful. Love is
beautiful. But there is another kind of love that is not only a
response to someone or something, but it actually makes things
happen. It’s a love that causes things to happen. It is not a
passive love.
And it kind of
leans more toward responsibility and commitment, it’s more like
devotion, than sensitive. And it’s a little hard to pin it down
exactly, but usually when we think of love, when we think of a
relationship, we are thinking of warm feelings. Pleasant feelings,
which comes from pleasant opinions about the other person. But the
general aura of it is pleasantness – pleasing.
But there is
another kind of love. Very different. This kind of love feels more
like devotion than pleasantness. More like “ we go down together, or
we don’t go at all.” That doesn’t feel so pleasant but it is much,
much stronger, it makes things happen. That kind of love compels you
to behave a certain way, to do certain things, which the other love
would not.
There’s a story
regarding the Rebbetzin Chaya Mushka, the Rebbe’s wife that
illustrates this point.
The Rebbetzin, in
her later years, would go out for drives, down to the waterfront, to
the beach. One time, the driver was taking her down to the ocean,
and the road that they usually took was closed, repairs or
something, and they had to take detour. They were going through this
other road, and there was one house where there were some police
cars in front of the house, there was some tumult going on, and they
drove by. After a few moments, the Rebbetzin said, “ turn around
please, let’s go back to that house and see what’s going on there.”
They drive back and the driver asked what’s going on and founds out
that there is a family there that can’t pay their rent and they are
being evicted.
So the Rebbetzin
told him to found out how much they need to pay the rent, and he
found out and the Rebbetzin wrote out a check and paid off the bill
and resolved the situation. The driver was absolutely stunned. So in
the car she explained to him. “ My father taught me that you never
see anything unless it is relevant to you. The reason we had to take
an alternative route and drive past that scene, I felt it must be
that I could do something about it, otherwise why would I have seen
it.” So she went back and fixed it.
So there is love
that is a kind of a plateau of feeling where I have always been
looking for love and I found the love and now I am content. And
there is another kind of love that is the exact opposite of content.
It’s an urgent love and it makes you want to do something. The story
of the Rebbetzin stopping and finding out what was wrong and fixing
it – this is not the pleasant kind of gentle love, this is a love
that is commitment, determination – you don’t let it go by, you make
it happen because of the love for another human being.
Love is a
commitment. A relationship is a commitment. And the commitment
happens to be, or can be pleasurable. But pleasure is not a
relationship. A relationship can be pleasurable. But if all you have
is the pleasure, it’s not a relationship; it’s just an event. A
relationship has permanence; an event is only an event.
There was a group
of women who asked me to come to speak for them and help them with a
problem they were having. They’re all recently started keeping
mitzvas and their husbands are not supportive.
So I said to
them, let me tell you from a man’s point of view what is bothering
your husbands.
You came home one
day, and not thinking, and not even suspecting that anyone can be
uninspired when you are inspired, and you tell your husband that “
from now on you have to …” He didn’t hear the rest of the sentence -
it didn’t matter. He heard the words “ have to” and he said “ no I
don’t” What’s this all of a sudden? It’s my house, my life –“I have
to? I don’t have to.”
Now if you had
said, “ well, you’re right, you don’t have to, I’d really like it if
you did.” He would have no problem now. But you said, “you have
to...” So it’s not about having to keep kosher, or Shabbos or
whatever. It’s that you changed the rules. You introduced new rules
into his life. Why would he want to accept that?
But that’s not
what’s really bothering him.
What’s really
bothering him is that you came home inspired – and not about him.
You came home excited and it wasn’t about him. He’s jealous. At home
you’re bored, but you come home from this class and you’re all
excited – what’s going on here? Who is the center of your life? What
happened? You used to get excited about me… Now that hurts!
But that’s not
really his problem. His problem is much deeper than that.
His problem is
that if you had come home and said that you had met a really good
looking guy, he would be upset, he would be angry, and he would
fight it. You came home and said, “G-d said”. How do you compete
with G-d? This is not fair. This is completely off the board. It’s
not following the rules of the game. So he doesn’t know how to
handle this so he is digging in his heels.
But even that’s
not his real problem
His real problem
is, you came home and said, “ G-d said to keep Shabbos. So I am
keeping Shabbos. G-d said to keep kosher, I ‘m keeping kosher. G-d
said to keep mikva, get out of my bed. And that doesn’t bother him.
What really bothers him is, what if G-d tells you to dump me, since
I don’t cooperate and since I’m not religious enough for you, what
if G-d says, dump him. What would you do?
That’s what
bothers him. I said I promised not to tell, I won’t tell your
husbands, but just tell me, if G-d told you to dump your husband,
what would you do? And there was silence in the room. Silence.
I said, “you’re
thinking?” They said “ yes”.
“About what? If I
were your husband, I would be very upset. What are you thinking? You
know Jack Benny’s joke, your money or your life – I’m thinking, I’m
thinking…What are you thinking?
According to
Torah, if G-d came and said, dump your husband, what should they
say?
We have two
possibilities – we have to find a precedent in Torah so that we know
what we are supposed to do. One day, G-d comes to Avraham and says,
you know your son, your only son, your favorite son Yitzchak, bring
him up on the altar. What did Avraham do? Got up early in the
morning and with gladness of heart set off to do what G-d had
commanded. From this we would learn that if G-d tells you to dump
your husband, you should get up early in the morning and with
gladness of heart, set off to do what G-d told you to do.
Now there is
another story. The other story is that G-d came to Moshe and said,
the people are so bad, they made a graven image. I am going to dump
them. And Moshe said, if You dump them, You have to dump me too.
Erase me from Your book. From this we would learn, that if G-d comes
to a woman and says, dump your husband, she should say, alright, but
I am going with him.
You can’t not
obey G-d. Dump him. And go with him.
Now which of the
two stories carries, holds the answer to this question. Very simply.
G-d didn’t say to Avraham, dump Yitzchak. He said, raise him back to
heaven. What was Avraham supposed to say? If he goes, I go. He
wasn’t invited. So Yitzchak wasn’t being dumped, he was being taken
back to heaven, and you can’t invite yourself to heaven.
So when G-d came
to Moshe, and said, I’m dumping the people, I’m not taking them to
heaven, I’m abandoning them in the desert, Moshe said, well, then I
go with them. And we don’t find anywhere in any of the commentaries,
we don’t find anywhere that G-d was annoyed with Moshe. It’s almost
like He gets an argument from everybody – the people don’t listen,
He talks to Moshe, He argues with Him, He gets no cooperation from
anybody. G-d wasn’t angry with Moshe. On the contrary, that’s
exactly what G-d wanted Moshe to say.
These women found
an inspiration, an excitement – they found a truth, a compelling
lifestyle and they got so excited and they were certain that just
mentioning it is going to excite their husbands, and the husbands
are also going to want to do things. It doesn’t work that way. They
have to convince their husbands that this excitement that they have
and this commitment that they have to mitzvas and to G-d, has not
replaced the husband, nor displaced him. He still comes first.
Why? Because
that’s what G-d wants. So it’s not a choice, G-d or your husband.
G-d wants you to choose your husband.
Now that kind of
love – the love that says, if you mess up, and you’re in trouble,
then I’m in trouble with you, that’s not the pleasant kind of love,
that’s not the pleasurable love, it’s a much richer, it’s much
stronger love, and it compels certain actions, certain behaviors.
Because just being content to be in love is not enough. It does not
satisfy this other kind of love.
So what happens
when two Jews get married? There are subjective feelings that come
and go. Rise and fall. Excitement /boredom. Sometimes you can’t
believe how lucky you are; sometimes you wonder if this is all there
is to life. Sometimes you’re feeling high and giddy in the
relationship, and sometimes it’s just nice. Those are all subjective
feelings.
There is an
objective reality to love that doesn’t come and go. It’s not that
fickle, it’s much more stable, much more permanent. It’s the
commitment, the devotion, the fact that you are no longer single -
that doesn’t change from day to day. The fact that you are a couple,
that doesn’t change from day to day. You are not more of a couple
one day, and less of a couple the next. That’s a consistency, which
is an objective reality that is stronger than our subjective
feelings.
Now how that
happens is a mystery. We have not yet discovered a really convincing
explanation or answer to this question. Two people, strangers for
the first half of their lives, quarter of their lives, get together
and by free choice decide to share a life and they get married.
How did this
completely subjective decision or choice create an objective reality
that is stronger and bigger than both of them? How does this happen?
You know that
people say that divorce is like an amputation. It’s a pretty
appropriate description. How does this happen? They are still two
separate people. They go their separate ways. Why is that an
amputation? Okay, you’ve invested in the relationship, you’ve got a
lot of memories…but amputation? Somehow, marriage – that bond which
is created voluntarily, gets out of control. You lose control. Once
you’ve stood under the chuppah, all voluntary and volitional
behavior is gone. Now, you have no choice. It’s not subjective
anymore, now it’s objective. This is your wife and this is how you
have to treat her. And what if I don’t want her to be my wife? Well,
then you have to have an amputation.
Because something
happened under the chuppah. You know, we think we have freedom of
choice and then all of a sudden, it’s gone. No more freedom of
choice. It’s a very powerful thing. That is the love that is
compelling, not the love that is pleasurable.
The love that is
pleasurable you give as a gift to whoever appeals to you. You share
that kind of love as a present, not that it should be frivolous, but
it’s yours. You give as you choose. But this other kind of love
doesn’t have that looseness to it. The other kind of love once given
is out of your control. Maybe it wasn’t in your control ever. Maybe
that’s not the kind of love that you can choose to give. It’s the
kind of love that happens when it is supposed to, not when you want
it to.
And maybe that’s
why sometimes we find ourselves married to a person we cannot live
with. I mean literally, and end up divorced. Why? Because …it’s not
like people sit there thinking, boy did I make a mistake. What was I
thinking to marry this person? I must have been drunk.
That’s not true
at all. The kind of love that ends up in marriage was really not the
kind of love you gave by choice. It was never under your control.
There was some kind of a destiny here, some kind of a purpose here,
and there was no way that you could have prevented it. And that’s
why when it happens with a person that you do get along with, it’s a
marriage, not a friendship. And when it has to end, it’s an
amputation, the party’s over.
So the respect we
have for the institution of marriage has got to be much greater,
much bigger, much more real, if this is believable, it has to be
much more important than the respect that we have for our own
emotions. So when a person says, I am in an abusive relationship, he
doesn’t treat me right, he makes fun of me, that’s nothing compared
to the truth and the strength and the power of the marriage. Because
what’s hurting is only that pleasant love, that voluntary love that
comes and goes. But what’s in place is that other love that is an
attachment, a commitment, a dedication, and a compelling oneness
that is beyond our control.
©
Copyright It's Good To Know™
Inc. - 2003/5763
|